anti fraud due diligence

Types and Methods

"The term “due diligence” comes from the legal concept that corporate executives have a legal obligation to duly exercise reasonable diligence in researching any potentially adverse facts in a business or transaction.


The phrase “due diligence” was first made popular by multinational law firms. It later became even more commonly used when prominent financial consulting firms began to incorporate the related practices of law firms into their services. As a result of this widespread popularity, “due diligence” is like a diluted trademark, often used as an interchangeable synonym for a “background check”, although real “background checks” can only effectively be provided by detective agencies, investigative or security firms. The essence of professional due diligence work is to provide complete, accurate and reliable fact finding, to establish a true and correct representation of a business situation for effective decision making.


The Due Diligence methods used by the law and financial firms that made the term popular are generally limited, and are not “investigative” in character. Such professional practice firms generally advise the client on requesting available corporate documents or accounting statements from potential business partners prior to contract closings, and assist the client in obtaining copies of similar publicly filed records declared by the subject of the inquiry.


This method commonly uses “check lists” of documents, licenses, etc. that should be identified and collected as the basis for specific types of transactions, such as mergers and acquisitions, real estate development deals, franchising and product licensing, joint venture contracts, or direct investment. The firm will have different checklists that are used for each type or category of transaction. In addition to identifying and collecting legal and commercial documents, the firm will review them to ensure that documents are properly signed, complete, accurate and otherwise legitimate.


Legal and management consulting firms do not attempt or purport to meet the standards of the economic security industry for background checks or investigations. This type of Due Diligence is not intended to provide a conclusion as to whether a potential partner is reliable. Accordingly, law and financial firms often hire security firms to conduct economic security investigations as a supplement to the “management consulting” type corporate Due Diligence.


The most widely used due diligence methods in the security industry are referred to by professionals as “Open Source” research. This type of background checks are conducted on the level of official registered information, such as corporate registrations and business filings, proprietary ownership registrations, mass media articles, publications and broadcast transcripts (called “media search”), licensing records, and similar data that is commonly referred to as “public records”.


Taken by itself without any additional methods, however, this type of background check is highly limited in usefulness. There are many “security” companies on the market that offer “public records” and “open source” research, providing only unverified raw data obtained from the most readily available computerized databases. While this approach is popular for its minimal cost, it most often cannot address the most valuable information upon which clients must make important business decisions. At worst, limited “public records” checks can overlook critical facts and mislead decision makers. At best, they usually raise many more questions than they answer.


A professional “Background Check” investigation consists of a full and advanced “open source” investigation, enhanced by extensive verification and analysis of data. Conducting effective “open source” background checks for use in due diligence investigations is both an art and a science.


For reliable results, it is necessary to use experienced professional investigators who know exactly what factors and indications to look for, can quickly assess or verify the validity of information discovered. For results to have practical value and benefit for the client to use in real-world business situations, the investigators must also be able to fully explain and interpret the significance of information, and make practical recommendations."

-Advisory Counsel